Salah a modern martyr ----Paris attacks were not 'nihilism' but sacred strategy

Salah a modern martyr

You may recall seeing an amazing story of a heroic Muslim as told on several world news channels about a Muslim, Salah Farah, who courageously stood in the way as Islamist militants stormed his bus in Kenya, refusing their demands to split from Christian passengers and instead taking a bullet that later killed him. Salah confronted gun-slinging terrorists bent on killing all the Christians who were travelling on the bus going to Nairobi on the 17th of December 2015. However, it was only when he died a month later that BBC, CNN and Al Jazeera felt his story was newsworthy. They praised Salah as a heroic “Muslim,” but what was it that really inspired him to be so brave?

Salah had been a Muslim most of his life but shortly before the attack he came to believe in Jesus Christ as his Lord and Saviour. If you want to know the real story behind the headline news read this article. It will be interesting to see whether the mainstream media will publish Salah’s story, considering the overwhelming undeniable proof that has come to light showing he had decided to follow the Lord Jesus Christ just a few days before the attack.

Everyone assumed Salah was Muslim because he had been a Muslim all his life. Even when the President of Kenya conferred on Salah the highest award for bravery – five weeks after he died – Salah was still being acclaimed as a Muslim. However, not long after his death various clues began surfacing, which reveal there was something else that inspired him to be so courageous.

A few days before the attack Salah had finished reading a book, God’s Apprentice, by Keith Doctor, which explains what it means to be a follower of Jesus Christ. As Salah journeyed on the bus with his friend Bursa, he told him about the impact this book had on him. Bursa later recalled how Salah shared with him how Jesus courageously stood up for the weak and the oppressed.

Why was Salah so brave?

Several days after the hijacking, Bursa received a cartoon-style tract on his phone from Salah who was in hospital. Bursa saved it on his phone but only remembered to look at it after Salah had died. He read the story as told in the captions on the cartoon style poster. He then phoned the number at the bottom of the page to find out more. This is how he met Joe*. They discussed many things including that Jesus Christ is Lord and Saviour. Bursa’s earlier conversation with Salah on the bus had warmed his heart to Jesus. Now he was ready to make a commitment and five days later he was baptised. Having been a friend of Salah, it did not take Bursa long to make a plan with Joe to visit Salah’s widow and five children. During their two-day visit, Joe and Bursa received a large unexpected sum of money as a gift via MPESA (telephonic transfer), which they gladly gave to Mrs Farah who was struggling to cope both emotionally and financially with the loss of her husband.

Friends of Salah

One memory she shared with these two Christian brothers involved a discussion Salah had with relatives the last evening before he left for Nairobi. He told them some new things he was learning about Jesus from a book that had deeply impressed him. The relatives suspected he was becoming a Christian and the conversation became very heated leading to a loud argument, when Salah even dared to show them the book. After they left he penned a handwritten note on page seven¹ which reads in English, “Jesus you’re my Saviour, I never knew but now I know. I’ll follow you; let them kill me, I don’t care, I’ll follow you.”

Over the next few weeks local Islamists invited Salah’s widow to join them in a fund raising project under the name “friends of Salah.” She didn’t trust them but they kept on pushing their scheme and even published a photo on twitter “#herosalah” purportedly showing Mrs Farah receiving a cheque for 10,000 shillings. (Joe assures us this photo is not Mrs Farah.)

Persecuted for the Truth

Angered by her unwillingness to co-operate, the Islamists came to her home looking for the book that they heard her husband had read. She could not read English so she had already given it away to Joe and Bursa. The Islamists refused to believe her explanation and forcefully ransacked her home hoping to find it. They were unable to find the book, but they did find nearly 17,000 shillings, which they stole.

Shortly after Bursa returned to his hometown, he was murdered, along with one other person who was showing an interest in hearing from Joe about Jesus. A sceptical reader may suggest that this story could have been fabricated, especially if one is disinclined to accept that Salah believed in Jesus Christ. One could argue, for example, that Bursa is now dead so a key eyewitness is missing. However, there are still two pieces of evidence: 1) the handwritten statement by Salah on page seven. Also Joe talked on the phone with Salah shortly before Salah boarded the bus. He told Joe that he had finished reading God’s Apprentice three days earlier.

Salah – A true hero

Furthermore, Bursa’s conversion was not the only “ripple” effect from Salah’s testimony, Abdul’s* story is yet another ripple. Abdul, who lives in a town not far from Salah, saw the news story telling how he courageously shielded Christians from being killed. He asked himself, “Why was Salah so brave?” Abdul became even more curious when, a month later, he heard that Salah had died from gunshots fired by the terrorists. Abdul explains how this question “wouldn’t leave my mind. My concern was just to know what triggered Salah to do that? At the time I might have assumed that Salah did it out of compassion for others as a human being, but whenever I related it to the Islamic dogma, I’d always suspect that there must be a special reason why he did what he did. But I couldn’t fathom what might have been in Salah’s mind. I wished he could have been alive so I could look him up and ask him personally why he did it!” Not long after these questions began weighing heavily on his mind, Abdul read a poster nailed to a tree, titled, Salah: A Hero and phoned the number at the bottom. This is how he met two Christian evangelists who explained that Jesus was the one who inspired Salah.

Until now (June 2016) Salah's inspirational and intriguing story has been instrumental in helping six Muslims discover Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior. Undoubtedly his legacy will impact many more. A 64 page cartoon style book telling Salah's story in colour can be purchased and downloaded here: www.storiesofthemartyrs.org/ I encourage you to check it out, even if only to preview several pages of the book which the publisher has freely made available. As the saying goes, “a picture is worth a thousand words.”

Conclusion

Will you “make the most of the opportunity” by engaging your Muslim friend in a “seasoned with salt” conversation about Salah? (Colossians 4:4-6, NIV)

Some well-intentioned Christians may want to introduce the punch-line early, but in keeping with how a mystery story unfolds, one needs to explore the clues sequentially and thus allow the story to unfold naturally. Another article titled, Muslim risks his life shielding Christians from terrorists, provides some additional insights using this investigative approach.

The book, God's Apprentice, which was the turning point in Salah's spiritual journey, is available in kindle format. You can buy it here.

Bible quotations are taken from the New Living Translation unless otherwise noted.

If you want to know how Salah's wife and five children are being cared for by Christians be sure to read the final appendix. If you have any other questions email me here.

* Not his real name.

Footnote

1 Salah's confession in his own Somali handwriting reads as follows (in English), “Jesus you’re my Saviour, I never knew but now I know. I’ll follow you; let them kill me, I don’t care, I’ll follow you.” A scanned image of Salah's handwritten testimony is available. Simply write to me.

Postscript

Earlier I asked whether the mainstream media will ever publish the real story behind the story. Will they explain that Jesus is the reason why Salah was so brave? Frankly it would take a miracle for this to happen, knowing journalistic protocol and how political correctness determines which stories are deemed newsworthy. Moreover, stories involving persecution of Christians by Muslims are “scandalously” under-reported, to quote Salim Mansur, a Muslim and long-time professor of political science at University of Western Ontario.

Appendix

How to Season your Conversation Using an Eye-Catching News Story

Colossians 4:2-6 tells us to be full of grace as we meet unbelievers in our daily lives. We ought to engage them in seasoned-with-salt conversations that raise questions which can open doors to share the truth in love.

Devote yourselves to prayer, being watchful and thankful. And pray for us, too, that God may open a door for our message, so that we may proclaim the mystery of Christ, for which I am in chains. Pray that I may proclaim it clearly, as I should. Be wise in the way you act toward outsiders; make the most of every opportunity. Let your conversation be always full of grace, seasoned with salt, so that you may know how to answer everyone. (NIV)

What does it mean to season our conversation with salt? Christ showed one way of doing this as seen in Luke chapter 13 verse one; About this time Jesus was informed that Pilate had murdered some people from Galilee as they were offering sacrifices at the Temple. “Do you think those Galileans were worse sinners than all the other people from Galilee?” Jesus asked. “Is that why they suffered? Not at all! And you will perish, too, unless you repent of your sins and turn to God.”

Notice how Jesus responded to someone's comment about a tragic event which had just happened and was now the talk of the town. Today we call this a headline news story. Interestingly, Christ responded by mentioning another tragic event. “And what about the eighteen people who died when the tower in Siloam fell on them? Were they the worst sinners in Jerusalem?” By making his point with a relevant news story, Jesus held the attention of his listeners. But more importantly, it underscored their need to repent.

How can we use headline news stories, like Christ did, as an illustration or bridge for sharing the Gospel?

Shortly after the terrorist attack in Brussels, CBC published an article expressing deep concern at the rising number of anti-Muslim hate crimes in Canada. It noted how bystanders often stay silent and concluded by suggesting ways that Canadians can respond appropriately when we hear someone make prejudicial or hateful remarks against Muslims. The article cited an anti-racism campaign in Australia and suggested that “backing the victim up doesn't have to involve confrontation. You could just sit or stand next to the victim or simply ask if they're ok and if they need help”.

As helpful as these suggestions are, they pale in comparison to a recent story that appeared on CNN, BBC, and Al Jazeera telling how a “Muslim” intervened and saved many people when terrorists attacked a bus intending to slaughter all the Christian passengers. Salah Farah's defiant act infuriated the attackers, so they shot him. He was flown to a hospital where he died a month later. Nine weeks later this story appeared again on international news when the President of Kenya conferred on Salah the highest award for bravery posthumously.

It wasn't difficult for me to broach this topic with my friend Ishmael and engage him in an intriguing conversation. I started by asking:

“Do you watch the news very often?”

“Yes,” Ishmael replied, “quite often.”

“Did you happen to see the story of a Muslim who was on a bus that was hijacked by Al Shabab terrorists? He bravely shielded the Christians and rescued them from being slaughtered.”

“No, I didn't hear that story.”

“This heroic act was highlighted on BBC, CNN and Al Jazeera, telling how the terrorists were infuriated by Salah's action and shot him. He died a month later from the wounds.” I commented on Salah's incredible bravery, “It makes you wonder if this was the normal way he acted or was there something else that inspired him?”

This sparked Ishmael’s curiosity, so I told him about an email I received from a friend who lives in Kenya not far from where the attack happened. The letter explained why Salah was so brave. Three days before the attack he had read a book, God's Apprentice by Keith Doctor. Salah told a friend who was sitting next to him on the bus that he was deeply impressed seeing how Christ courageously stood up for the weak and oppressed.

It so happened my discussion with Ishmael was near the end of my visit, so I didn't have time to tell the full story. However, Ishmael promised to send me his email address so that we could continue this conversation.

I pray that many ordinary Christians will take the time to become familiar with Salah's story and consider how they, too, can point people to Jesus based on the insights drawn from Colossians 4 and Luke 13. May Salah's bravery inspire many Christians to be unashamed of the Gospel. May we overcome our timidity and fear of Muslims, for God has given us a spirit of power, love, and self discipline. (2 Tim 1:7)

What has happened to Salah's family?

We mentioned earlier that Mrs Farah was defrauded by neighbors of large sums of money raised via the #herosalah campaign. Then an Islamist neighbor stole 17,000 shillings from her while ransacking her home looking for the book that her husband cherished. Having endured these painful experiences, she decided to move far away to a safer home with the help of Christians. This secret undertaking was very complicated, dangerous and costly but God answered prayer and we are deeply grateful for the miraculous way he rescued her.

However, before arriving safely at her new home, the story took an amazing twist. We learned that the neighbor who had robbed and persecuted her so mercilessly was tortured and murdered by fellow Islamists.

Here's how it happened. When Mrs Farah mysteriously “disappeared” on May 1st some Islamists who were behind the twitter money making scheme and had been trusting her neighbor Mr. XXX to keep a close eye on her became very worried. They feared that Mr. XXX had taken Mrs Farah and hidden her away, intending to reveal her at the last minute when the President of Kenya was to visit the area. (He had promised to come and meet Salah Farah's widow to give her a gift in honor of her husband's heroic bravery.) Mr. XXX's fellow Islamists became convinced that he intended to subvert their scheme by bringing out the real wife just as they were about to present their (fake) widow to the President. Infuriated by this, they tortured him seeking to find out where he had hidden her and eventually they killed him.

This explains how the neighbor who persecuted her so harshly died, at the hands of his own fellow Islamists. This is a terrible way to end one's life, nevertheless, it is in keeping with how Scripture says God metes out justice to those who mercilessly oppress vulnerable widows. At the same time it magnifies our appreciation and praise for the awesome power God shows in rescuing a widow and her children. This amazing rescue reminds us of Isaiah 49:24-26 where God says, “your children I will save” from tyrannical oppressors. “Can plunder be taken from warriors, or captives be rescued from the fierce? I will contend with those who contend with you, and your children I will save. I will make your oppressors eat their own flesh; they will be drunk on their own blood, as with wine.” Notice the positive impact of God's judgement against such evil oppressors, “Then all mankind will know that I, the LORD, am your Savior, your Redeemer, the Mighty One of Jacob.” (bold font added for emphasis)

Can you think of a more fitting and God-honoring way to conclude these verses? An article titled, God our Savior, Redeemer, explains how relevant this passage is to our times. Over the last 15 years the world has seen an unprecedented resurgence of various Jihadist groups around the world brutally murdering non-Muslims but also killing countless fellow Muslims. The resulting exodus of millions of refugees fleeing from violent, chaotic conditions in majority Muslim nations is contributing to many Muslims becoming disillusioned with Islam. Indeed, more Muslims are turning to Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior than we have ever seen!

Is thirty five dollars too much to ask for a 64 page book?

Salah paid a high price for following Christ, so we should not be shocked at having to pay a high price for a book that tells his story so beautifully in pictures. As the saying goes, “a picture is worth a thousand words.” The artist who worked hard illustrating Salah's story has dedicated it in honor of Salah. The funds received will go towards supporting his widow and children. By purchasing this book you will not only receive a dynamic, seasoned-with-salt testimonial for sharing the Gospel with Muslims, you will also help Salah's family. Bear in mind they are very poor. Also they were deprived of a $39,000 gift which the President of Kenya recently donated in honor of Salah. As explained earlier, this honorarium was usurped by an imposter who pretended to be Salah's wife in collaboration with fraudulent schemers.

Finally, by purchasing this book and sharing it with a Muslim friend you can be part of the ongoing legacy of Salah's witness. As far as we know, six Muslims have, so far, become followers of Jesus Christ after being intrigued to know why Salah was so brave.

Paris attacks were not 'nihilism' but sacred strategy

LEADING commentator Janet Daley's article in Saturday's Telegraph ‘The West is at war with a death cult’ stands for everything that is woeful about European elites’ response to Islamic jihad.

It is a triumph of religious illiteracy.

The jihadist enemy, she asserts, is utterly unintelligible, so beyond encompassing in ‘coherent, systematic thought’ that no vocabulary can describe it: ‘This is just insanity’,

she writes. Because the enemy is ‘hysterical’, lacking 'rational demands', 'negotiable limits,’ or ‘intelligible objectives’ Daley claims it is pointless to subject its actions to any form of historical, social or theological analysis, for no-one should attempt to ‘impose logic on behaviour that is pathological’.

Despite this, Daley then ventures to offer analysis of and explanations for ISIS’ actions, but in doing so she relies upon her own conceptual categories, not those of ISIS.

Her explanations therefore fall wide of the mark.

 

‘Civilians’

Daley writes: ‘We face a violent and highly contagious madness that believes the killing of civilians is a moral act.’  Here she appeals to Western concepts of war, reflected, for example, in the Geneva Convention, which provides detailed principles for the ‘protection of civilian persons’.

Yet the first step in understanding a cultural system alien to one’s own, is to describe it in its own terms.

ISIS does not subscribe to the Geneva Convention.  Its actions and strategies are based upon medieval Islamic laws of jihad, which make no use of the modern Western concept of ‘civilian’.

They do, however, refer to the category of disbelievers (mushrik or kafir).
ISIS believes that killing disbelievers is a moral act, in accordance, for example, with Sura 9:5 of the Qur’an, which states :‘Fight and kill the idolators (mushrik) wherever you find them'.

 

 Not nihilism

Daley writes: ‘The enemy has stated explicitly that it does not revere life at all’ and ‘Civilians are not collateral damage in this campaign: their deaths are the whole point.’  She goes on to lament that the latest French attacks lack any purpose, but are ‘carried out for the sheer nihilistic thrill of it’.

The claim that ISIS does not ‘revere life’ seems to refer to any number of statements by Islamic radicals, including an ISIS militant who vowed to ‘fill the streets of Paris with dead bodies’, and boasted that ISIS ‘loves death like you love life’ (see here).  This is a theological reference to a series of verses in the Qur’an in which Jews are criticised for desiring life (Sura 2:94-96, 62:6-8).

According to the Qur’an, loving life is a characteristic of infidels (Sura 3:14; 14:3; 75:20; 76:27) because it causes them to disregard the importance of the next life.  The taunt much used by jihadis, ‘We love death like you love life’,  implies that jihadis are bound for paradise while their enemies are hell-bound.

The point of these statements is that Muslims are willing to fight to the death, while their infidel enemies will turn back in battle. This is not about reverence for life, but about who has the will to win. This has nothing to do with nihilism, which is a belief that there are no values, nothing to be loyal to, and no purpose in living. In fact ISIS fighters have strong and clear loyalties and values, alien though they may be to those of Europe.

Daley’s claim that the deaths are ‘the whole point’ is also mistaken. While it is true that the jihadis consider killing infidels a meritorious act, potentially earning the killer a place in paradise (see here), and they consider being killed in battle against infidels a ticket to paradise, in fact the killings do serve a strategic purpose. This is to make infidels afraid, and thereby to weaken their will to resist Islamic dominance.

This strategy is commended by the Qur’an, for example in Sura 8:12, 'I shall cast dread into the hearts of those who disbelieve. So strike above (their) necks and strike (off) all their fingers!', as well as by the successful example of Muhammad in fighting the Jews of Medina, referred to in Sura 33:26-27, ‘He brought down from their fortifications those of the People of the Book who supported them, and cast dread into their hearts. You killed a group (of them), and took captive (another) group. And he caused you to inherit their land, their homes, and their wealth, and a land you had not set foot on.’  A similar passage is Sura 59:2, which ISIS has in fact been quoting in its celebrations of the Paris carnage.

It may seem to Daley that ISIS’ often-stated intention of defeating the West is fanciful, but the point is to understand ISIS, and as far as it is concerned, these deadly attacks are instrumental in weakening the will of infidels and hastening eventual victory.

Daley wonders what possible point these attacks could serve. She speculates:  '… what is the alternative that is being demanded? Sharia law? The subjection of women? An end to liberal democracy? Are any of these things even within the bounds of consideration? What could be accomplished by national self-doubt or criticism at this point, when there is not even a reasonable basis for discussion with the enemy?'  It is hardly a secret that the ultimate goal of ISIS is to bring non-Muslims everywhere  to convert to Islam or live under an Islamic caliphate as dhimmis. Sharia law and the subjection of women are part and parcel of this.

It is odd that Daley laments having no reasonable basis for negotiating with the enemy.  ISIS is not playing by a Western-style negotiating rule book. It is following Muhammad’s instructions to his followers to offer three choices to infidels: conversion, surrender, or the sword.  Bin Ladin has explained that the West’s rejection of this framework is the whole reason for its conflict with what he calls ‘the authority of Islam’:

“Our talks with the infidel West and our conflict with them ultimately revolve around one issue; one that demands our total support, with power and determination, with one voice, and it is: Does Islam, or does it not, force people by the power of the sword to submit to its authority corporeally if not spiritually? Yes. There are only three choices in Islam: [1] either willing submission [conversion]; or [2] payment of the jizya, through physical, though not spiritual, submission to the authority of Islam; or [3] the sword, for it is not right to let him [an infidel] live. The matter is summed up for every person alive: Either submit, or live under the suzerainty of Islam, or die.” (The Al Qaeda Reader)

 It may seem unimaginable to European elites that ISIS is fighting for the goal of the surrender or conversion of Europe, but ISIS is thinking in time frames which extend to centuries, and their forebears conquered vast territories using such tactics.  A final act of conquest can be preceded by decades, or even centuries, of military raids.

While killing is currently the main mode of ISIS’ attacks inside the West, if they could they would use other tactics as well, such as taking booty and slaves or destroying infrastructure, as they have been doing in Syria and Iraq.

 Grievances Daley claims it is pointless to argue with people who have no reasonable grievances, for ‘the French people did not deserve this, just as Americans did not deserve 9/11’.  However the important question is how ISIS sees its own motivations.  Their ideology teaches them that infidels deserve death, simply by virtue of their unbelief.  This has nothing to do with France’s history of colonialism or its treatment of Muslim minorities.  ISIS needed no appeal to grievances to justify killing and enslaving Yazidis in Iraq and Syria, so why should they view the people of France any differently?  Their objection to Europeans is that they are not Muslims, and their objection to European states is that they do not implement sharia law.

 

Irresponsible

It is irresponsible and dangerous to claim that a tenacious enemy is insane and incomprehensible. To refuse to acknowledge the ideology of ISIS, and to deny its relevance is tantamount to a death-wish.
Like so many other revivalist Islamic groups, ISIS believes that it will be successful if it stays faithful to its divinely-mandated goals and tactics.  It believes the nations of Europe are morally corrupt, weak infidels who love life too much to fight a battle to the death with stern Muslim soldiers who have set their hearts on paradise.  It believes Europe stands on the wrong side of history.

To combat this ideology it is necessary for Europe to prove ISIS wrong on all counts. It must show strength, not weakness. It must have confidence in its cultural and spiritual identity. It must be willing to fight for its survival. It must show that it believes in itself enough to fight for its future. It must defend its borders.  It must act like someone who intends to win an interminably long war against an implacable foe.

There is a great deal Europe could have done to avert this catastrophe.  It could, long ago, have challenged the Islamic view of history which idolised jihad and its intended outcome, the dhimma.  It could have demanded that Islam renounce its love affair with conquest and dominance.  It could have encouraged Muslims to follow a path of self-criticism leading to peace.  This lost opportunity is what Bat Ye’or referred to in a prescient 1993 interview as the ‘relativization of religion, a self-critical view of the history of Islamic imperialism’.

Instead the elites of Europe embarked on decades of religiously illiterate appeasement and denialism.

There is still much that European states could do to defeat ISIS.  They could, for example, inflict catastrophic military failure upon it as a powerful counter-argument to its theology of success.  This will not deliver decisive, final victory against jihadism, but it will make the supremacist claims of ISIS less credible and hurt its recruitment.  Islam’s laws of war allow Muslims to suspend their battle with infidels temporarily if there is no immediate prospect of victory and the risks to their cause are too great.

Europe also needs to act to suppress incitement of jihadi ideology by its clients, including the anti-Israeli jihadism of the Palestinian Authority.  It must put more pressure on the militarily vulnerable Gulf states to stop funding Islamic radicalism throughout the Middle East and exporting jihad-revering versions of Islamic theology throughout the whole world.

One hope for Europe is that Islamic populations will get tired of the doctrine of jihad and all its bitter fruits. There are some signs that this is already happening, and many of the Muslims who are now seeking asylum in their hundreds of thousands will have come to this conclusion.  However it seems likely that Muslim communities now established within Europe will be the last to reconsider their dogmas and their take on history, because they have not had to suffer first-hand the harsh realities of life under Islamic dystopias such as the ISIS ‘caliphate’ or Iran’s Islamic Revolution.  A 2014 opinion poll found that among French 18-24 year olds, the Islamic State had an approval rating of 27%, which must include the overwhelming majority of young French Muslim men.  For Europe, the challenge from within will be more enduring and intractable than the challenge from without.

Nevertheless, European states could still do much on their own turf. They could ban Saudi and other Middle Eastern funding to Islamic organisations, including mosques. They could stop appeasing Islamists in their midst. They could, even at this late hour, demand that the large and rapidly growing Muslim communities now well-established across Europe engage in constructive self-criticism of their religion, for the sake of peace.